Posted on

xDuoo XD05T Portable DAC and Tube Headphones Amplifier Review

Introduction

xDuoo Logo

xDuoo is an audio brand operated by the Shenzhen xDuoo Technology Co., Ltd. (Yidu) company, that started out as an ODM (original design manufacturer) for various companies before launching its own brand nearly a decade ago. The brand has become synonymous with desktop headphone and speaker amplifiers in particular, such as the TA-22 we saw before, although lately there have been multiple xDuoo portable DAC/amps that have caught my eye. Take the XD05 PRO, for example, offering modular DACs and amplifiers to allow for a highly customizable portable source. I’ve been using it on and off with IEMs and headphones alike, with its bulkier size being the only thing keeping me from using it everywhere. There are smaller entries in the XD lineup too, yet I saw something at the Shenzhen International Audio Show which got me impatient for its release so I could test it properly at home.

I am referring to the subject of today’s review, the xDuoo XD05T where the T stands for Tube. When you think of tube amplifiers, chances are high that you are picturing something huge with hot and glowy tubes, almost something vintage in an age where solid state sources are the norm. However, with IEMs becoming increasingly popular and with it also a plethora of portable sources to enjoy, we have also seen many portable sources use smaller tubes. In fact, there are even DAPs (digital audio players) that have managed to fit tiny vacuum tubes along with the rest of the audio circuitry as well as the screen and the hardware needed to drive the operating system. Many of these go with Korg Nutubes, and we’ve also seen others adopt slightly larger—but still decidedly on the micro size—tubes you can see glowing through vents. The goal here is to deliberately add some distortion, which might seem weird in the quest for the cleanest sound, to allow for a subjective improvement in the listening experience for some people. This can be via an added sense of space, some would perceive tubes as warmer sounding, and many others simply prefer a less analytical presentation. No matter which side of this debate you fall into, there’s no doubt that tube amplifiers are only increasing in popularity again and portable sources are leading the way. Many thanks to SHENZHENAUDIO for providing a review sample of the xDuoo XD05T, as we examine xDuoo’s take on this idea with a look at the product specifications below, so be sure to click the image twice to fully open it and go through all the details.

Specifications

Posted on

Geometric Future Model 5 Review

Geometric Future Model 5 Review | TechPowerUp

Geometric Future Model 5 Review 10

Packaging & Contents »

Introduction

Geometric Future Logo

I would like to thank Geometric Future for supplying the review sample.

Geometric Future has been around since 2020 with a focus on creating unique cases with interesting material mixes or color highlights. The brand offers cases, power supplies, fans and coolers. True to their name, especially their enclosures look quite futuristic with a simple, clear range of SKUs from the Model 2 up to the Model 8. Today, we get to review the Geometric Future Model 5, which is available in four distinct color options. Alternatively, you can also pick up the Model 5 Vent, which ships in three color options. As bright orange is part of the brand color scheme, the Model 5 is available with that hue as well, which is the one we are reviewing here.

Specifications

Geometric Future Model 5
Case Type:Mid-Tower
Material:0.8/1.2 mm steel, and 4 mm tempered glass
Weight:N/A
Slots:7
Drive Bays:2x Internal 2.5/3.5″
Motherboard
Form Factors:
Mini-ITX, Micro-ATX, ATX, and E-ATX
Dimensions:440 x 242 x 480 mm
Front Door/Cover:N/A
Front Fans:N/A
Rear Fans:1x 120/140 mm (1x 140 mm PWM ARGB fans pre-installed)
Top Fans:3x 120 / 140 mm (optional)
Bottom Fans:3x 120 / 140 mm (3x 140 mm PWM ARGB reverse blade fans pre-installed)
Side Fans:1x 120 / 140 / 160 mm (1x 140 mm PWM ARGB reverse blade fan pre-installed)
Motherboard Back Fans:2x 120 mm (optional)
Front Radiator:N/A
Rear Radiator:120 mm / 140 mm
Top Radiator:360 mm / 420 mm
Bottom Radiator:360 mm
Side Radiator:N/A
I/O:1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
2x USB 3.0
1x Headphone
1x Microphone
Fan/LED Controller:N/A
Compatibility:CPU Cooler: 180 mm
GPU: 460 mm
PSU: 160 mm

‘).appendTo(‘body’); $(window).scroll(nextPageScrollHandler); } if (evt.touches.length==0) $(‘#keep-scrolling-buffer’).removeClass(‘show’); else { if ($(‘#keep-scrolling’).hasClass(‘show’)) $(‘#keep-scrolling-buffer’).addClass(‘show’); } }); }); ]]>

‘); $(‘.tpu-fancybox-wrap’).css(‘maxWidth’, maxWidth);*/ instance.$refs.stage.on(‘transitionend’, function() { updateButtonPos(instance); }); }, onUpdate: updateButtonPos, afterShow: function(instance, slide) { updateButtonPos(instance); instance.$refs.inner.find(‘.fancybox-tpu-nav’).show(); }, beforeClose: function(instance, slide) { instance.$refs.inner.find(‘.fancybox-tpu-nav’).hide(); }, afterClose: function(instance, slide) { $(‘.tpu-fancybox-wrap’).contents().unwrap(); $(‘body’).removeClass(‘tpu-fancybox-body-wrap’) }, baseTpl: ‘

‘, }); }); } loadjs.ready([‘jquery’, ‘fancybox’], function() { attachLightbox(function() { return $(‘.text a:has(>img)’).filter(function(i, el) { return $(this).attr(‘href’).match(/.(jpg|gif|png)(?=$|[?#])/) != null; }); }); }); loadjs.ready([‘jquery’], function() { $(‘.review’).on(‘click’, ‘.spoiler > a’, function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).next(‘div’).toggle(); }); $(‘.review’).on(‘click’, ‘.ispoiler’, function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).find(‘div’).css(‘filter’, ”); $(this).removeClass(‘ispoiler’); }); }); loadjs.ready([‘jquery’], function() { $(‘table.tputbl.sort-header’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).css(‘cursor’, ‘pointer’).on(‘click’, function(e) { var header=$(this) header.parents(‘table’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).removeClass(‘sort-active’); header.addClass(‘sort-active’); var idx=header.parents(‘tr’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).index(this); header.parents(‘table’).find(‘td, th[scope=row]’).filter(function() { return $(this).index() == idx; }).sortElementsTPU(function(a, b) { a=$(a).text(); b=$(b).text(); if (header.hasClass(‘sort-force-number’)) { a=parseInt(a, 10); b=parseInt(b, 10); } if (header.hasClass(‘sort-nan-is-zero’)) { if (isNaN(a)) a=0; if (isNaN(b)) b=0; } try { var result=a.localeCompare(b, undefined, { numeric: true, sensitivity: ‘base’ }); return result; } catch(e) { if (a>b) return 1; if (a

Posted on

FiiO FT1 Closed-Back Headphones Review – Great Value!

Introduction

FiiO Logo

We recently visited FiiO to tour its large industrial park and got to know more about how the audio brand is able to release so many products each year, most of which seem to do well critically and commercially. These include old stalwarts such as IEMs and portable DAC/amps, but also now we see desktop audio equipment including speakers, network streamers, R2R DACs, keyboards, and headphones too, including the open-back dynamic driver FT3 and planar magnetic FT5. Soon after both of these headphones were released, FiiO added a closed-back set of headphones to its portfolio, this time under its sister brand Jade Audio, with the JT1 costing under $70. I have the JT1 here and thought it had potential, albeit was clearly going for a more mainstream V-shaped tuning and detail retrieval clearly wasn’t high priority. I was even considering doing a quick look article of it, but then FiiO released something recently that deserved far more attention.

The FiiO FT1 is a closed-back set of dynamic driver headphones that was announced in mid-August, although it has been in such demand that FiiO can’t seem to keep up months later too. It’s not hard to see why this has been so popular, given FiiO has effectively designed it to look and feel far more expensive than it is. The launch edition came with American black walnut ear cups, although now there is also a natural beech wood version with a lighter colored headband too. If this reminds you of some Sivga headphones, then you are thinking correctly. But what if I told you the FT1 was priced appreciably lower than the likes of the Sivga Robin and Oriole? Those looking at Meze wooden headphones will be even further away price wise, so already there’s a price advantage for FiiO even before we get to other aspects such as the 60 mm custom-designed drivers, and nice accessories including two stock cables and a carry case. Ultimately, it’s the sound signature that matters most though. So let’s thank FiiO for providing a review sample to TechPowerUp and put the FT1 to the test today, as we begin with a look at the product specifications in the table below.

Specifications

FiiO FT1 Over-Ear Headphones
Materials:Steel frame and headband, wood ear cups, suede headband lining, fabric + pleather ear pads, foam filling
Transducer Principle:Closed-back, over-ear, dynamic
Frequency Response:10 Hz–40 kHz
Sensitivity:98 dB/mW @1 kHz
Impedance:32 Ω
Cables:Dual 3.5 mm TRS from headphones to 3.5 mm (6.35 mm w/adapter) SE or 4.4 mm BAL connector to source
Weight (without cable):340 g
Warranty:One year
Posted on

LUMINKEY Magger68 Pro HE Gaming Keyboard Review

Introduction

LUMINKEY Logo

So far 2024, and no doubt 2025 too, is looking to herald in the age of Hall effect magnetic switch keyboards. We’ve seen entries from a lot of brands already, with everyone using these switches to showcase the customizable actuation point and near-instantaneous actuation, in addition to a few other features that have even led to bans in games owing to how powerful they can be. This has become a new playing ground for most brands, since almost everyone is starting from scratch and there are very few magnetic switch manufacturers. This allows for new brands to come out and compete directly with the big boys, and we’ve already seen some upsets from Asian brands in particular. Today we take on another newcomer and see if LUMINKEY has something to interest our readers with the Magger68 HE keyboard.

Createkeebs is a China-based keyboard brand that started in 2020 and has focused on custom high-end keyboards, including group buys and the sale of individual parts you can mix and match to assemble your own dream keyboard. LUMINKEY is a sister brand which started later, possibly even this year itself, and goes for pre-assembled keyboards in various colors and combinations that feel premium and have some carefully implemented tweaks to help differentiate them from the norm, but manage to do so at more affordable prices. LUMINKEY has a few mechanical keyboards in its product line already, with the Magger68 being its first Hall effect keyboard. For what it’s worth, I’ve seen it being referred to as Magger68 and Magger 68 by both LUMINKEY and its retailer network, with the former seemingly correct based on my research. The keyboard comes in “Performance” or “Professional” versions which differ on the switch used as well as the case design itself, although either version is available in your choice of three colors/finishes to the aluminium alloy chassis. I have the Magger68 Pro in the anodized black finish, and the photo above shows the champagne gold for reference. The feature set and user experience should be identical across the colors, and very similar for either version too beyond the switches themselves. Thanks to Mechkeys for providing a review sample to TechPowerUp, and we begin with a look at the product specifications in the table below.

Specifications

LUMINKEY Magger68 Pro HE Keyboard
Layout:68-key, 65% form factor in a modified US ANSI layout
Material:Aluminium case and plate, PBT plastic keycaps, silicone sheets
Macro Support:Yes
Dimensions:319 (L) x 110 (W) x 30 (H) mm
Weight:1.2 kg / 2.64 lbs
Wrist Rest:No
Anti-ghosting:Full N-Key rollover USB
Media Keys:Available as a layered function
Cable Length:6 ft / 1.8 m
Software:Yes
Switch Type:Gateron Jade Pro magnetic switches
Lighting:RGB per-key lighting
Interface:USB
Warranty:One year
Posted on

Thermaltake The Tower 600 Review

Thermaltake The Tower 600 Review | TechPowerUp

Thermaltake The Tower 600 Review 3

Packaging & Contents »

Introduction

Thermaltake Logo

I would like to thank Thermaltake for supplying the review sample.

Thermaltake has a wide range of case products and is not afraid to push the boundaries with The Tower 600 being no different. Having reviewed the first Tower product back in 2021, the whole case family has come a long way since – including adding “The” to named SKUs. With The Tower 600, you get their biggest variant and can pick from four different colors. Besides the classic black and white versions, The Tower 600 is also available in hydrangea blue to celebrate 25 years of Thermaltake as well as a matcha green variant with that special branding. We are lucky to have received that green version for review. On top of that Thermaltake has provided color matched fans and an AIO which we will use for the review build as well.

Specifications

Thermaltake The Tower 600
Case Type:Tower Chassis
Material:Steel, plastic, and tempered glass
Weight:9.70 kg / 21.39 lbs.
Slots:7
Drive Bays:2x Internal 2.5 or 1x 3.5″
1x Internal 2.5″
Motherboard
Form Factors:
Mini-ITX, Micro-ATX, ATX
Dimensions:550 x 420 x 286.4 mm
Front Door/Cover:N/A
Front Fans:N/A
Rear Fans:2x 120/140 mm (optional)
Top Fans:3x 120 or 2x 140 mm (2x 140 x 140 x 25 mm CT140 fan (1500rpm, 30.5 dBA) pre-installed)
Left Side Fans:3x 120 mm (optional)
Right Side Fans:3x 120 or 140 mm (optional)
Power Cover Fans:1x 120/140 mm (optional)
Bottom Fans:1x 120/140 mm (optional)
Front Radiator:N/A
Rear Radiator:N/A
Top Radiator:N/A
Bottom Radiator:N/A
Left Side Radiator:360 mm
Right Side Radiator:420 mm
I/O:1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
4x USB 3.0
1x Headphone
1x Microphone
Fan/LED Controller:N/A
Compatibility:CPU Cooler: 210 mm
GPU: 400 mm (280 mm with power cover)
PSU: 220 mm

‘).appendTo(‘body’); $(window).scroll(nextPageScrollHandler); } if (evt.touches.length==0) $(‘#keep-scrolling-buffer’).removeClass(‘show’); else { if ($(‘#keep-scrolling’).hasClass(‘show’)) $(‘#keep-scrolling-buffer’).addClass(‘show’); } }); }); ]]>

‘); $(‘.tpu-fancybox-wrap’).css(‘maxWidth’, maxWidth);*/ instance.$refs.stage.on(‘transitionend’, function() { updateButtonPos(instance); }); }, onUpdate: updateButtonPos, afterShow: function(instance, slide) { updateButtonPos(instance); instance.$refs.inner.find(‘.fancybox-tpu-nav’).show(); }, beforeClose: function(instance, slide) { instance.$refs.inner.find(‘.fancybox-tpu-nav’).hide(); }, afterClose: function(instance, slide) { $(‘.tpu-fancybox-wrap’).contents().unwrap(); $(‘body’).removeClass(‘tpu-fancybox-body-wrap’) }, baseTpl: ‘

‘, }); }); } loadjs.ready([‘jquery’, ‘fancybox’], function() { attachLightbox(function() { return $(‘.text a:has(>img)’).filter(function(i, el) { return $(this).attr(‘href’).match(/.(jpg|gif|png)(?=$|[?#])/) != null; }); }); }); loadjs.ready([‘jquery’], function() { $(‘.review’).on(‘click’, ‘.spoiler > a’, function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).next(‘div’).toggle(); }); $(‘.review’).on(‘click’, ‘.ispoiler’, function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).find(‘div’).css(‘filter’, ”); $(this).removeClass(‘ispoiler’); }); }); loadjs.ready([‘jquery’], function() { $(‘table.tputbl.sort-header’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).css(‘cursor’, ‘pointer’).on(‘click’, function(e) { var header=$(this) header.parents(‘table’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).removeClass(‘sort-active’); header.addClass(‘sort-active’); var idx=header.parents(‘tr’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).index(this); header.parents(‘table’).find(‘td, th[scope=row]’).filter(function() { return $(this).index() == idx; }).sortElementsTPU(function(a, b) { a=$(a).text(); b=$(b).text(); if (header.hasClass(‘sort-force-number’)) { a=parseInt(a, 10); b=parseInt(b, 10); } if (header.hasClass(‘sort-nan-is-zero’)) { if (isNaN(a)) a=0; if (isNaN(b)) b=0; } try { var result=a.localeCompare(b, undefined, { numeric: true, sensitivity: ‘base’ }); return result; } catch(e) { if (a>b) return 1; if (a

Posted on

Sparkle Arc A770 ROC Review

Introduction

Sparkle Logo

The Sparkle Arc A770 ROC is the company’s newest Intel Arc graphics card. Intel’s discrete GPU design has been on the market for two years now, with the next generation expected soon. With the “ROC,” Sparkle wants to establish a special name for custom-design graphics cards with a factory overclock, similar to ASUS “ROG.” we’ve known Sparkle for many years, back in the day it was an NVIDIA GeForce add-in-card partner going back as far as the 2000s. Nowadays, as a brand, Sparkle is owned by the TUL Corporation, a Taiwan-based OEM giant that also runs the popular AMD Radeon brand PowerColor.

The Arc A770 is Intel’s top SKU for this generation, the other models are Arc A750 and A580. Both the Arc A770 and A750 are priced well under the $300 mark, and target the 1080p gaming space that sees the likes of the GeForce RTX 3060, Radeon RX 6600 series, and the RX 7600 battle it out. It’s possible to game at 1440p if you know your way around your game’s settings, or can take advantage of the XeSS upscaling feature, if your game supports it. The Arc “Alchemist” family of graphics cards are every bit as contemporary as the latest GPUs from NVIDIA and AMD. These meet the full DirectX 12 Ultimate feature-set, including real time ray tracing.

Over the past two years Intel’s software team has been releasing countless driver optimization patches, have upped their Game Ready driver support, and are now on par with the other two GPU vendors in terms of release cadence.

The Sparkle Arc A770 is built on the same advanced 6 nm ACM-G10 silicon as its lower-tier counterpart, the A750. However, the A770 maximizes performance by enabling all 8 rendering slices present on the chip, resulting in a total of 32 Xe cores. This configuration translates to 512 execution units and an impressive 4,096 unified shaders. The graphics card is equipped with a robust memory subsystem, boasting 16 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit memory bus, operating at 16 Gbps and delivering a substantial memory bandwidth of 512 GB/s. Communication with the system is facilitated through a contemporary PCI-Express 4.0 x16 interface, making full use of PCI Resizable BAR for enhanced performance.

Sparkle’s A770 ROC features a relatively compact triple-slot cooling solution incorporating an aluminium fin-stack heatsink with two fans, and a sleek cooler shroud in black plastic. The PCB on the other hand showcases a vibrant blue color scheme. Under the hood, the card uses the Intel reference PCB design, which means no corners have been cut. The GPU VRM has been strengthened and is now eight-phase, up from six phases on the original Intel card. Interestingly, despite the “OC” naming, the card ticks at reference card clock speeds of 210 MHz base and 2400 MHz boost. Memory is clocked at reference too, with 2187 MHz. Sparkle’s card is currently listed online for $300, a small premium over the current baseline price of $270 for Arc A770.

Intel Arc A770 Market Segment Analysis
 PriceCoresROPsCore
Clock
Boost
Clock
Memory
Clock
GPUTransistorsMemory
RX 6500 XT$1401024322685 MHz2825 MHz2248 MHzNavi 245400M4 GB, GDDR6, 64-bit
Arc A580$1803072961700 MHzN/A2000 MHzACM-G1021700M8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3050$1652560321552 MHz1777 MHz1750 MHzGA10612000M8 GB, GDDR6, 128-bit
Arc A750$22035841122050 MHzN/A2000 MHzACM-G1021700M8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RX 6600 XT$2052048642359 MHz2589 MHz2000 MHzNavi 2311060M8 GB, GDDR6, 128-bit
RTX 3060$2203584481320 MHz1777 MHz1875 MHzGA10612000M12 GB, GDDR6, 192-bit
RX 7600$2502048642250 MHz2625 MHz2250 MHzNavi 3313300M8 GB, GDDR6, 128-bit
RX 7600 XT$3102048642470 MHz2755 MHz2250 MHzNavi 3313300M16 GB, GDDR6, 128-bit
RTX 4060$2853072481830 MHz2460 MHz2125 MHzAD10718900M8 GB, GDDR6, 128-bit
Arc A770$27040961282100 MHz2400 MHz2187 MHzACM-G1021700M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
Sparkle Arc
A770 ROC
$28040961282100 MHz2400 MHz2187 MHzACM-G1021700M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3060 Ti$3004864801410 MHz1665 MHz1750 MHzGA10417400M8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 4060 Ti$3804352482310 MHz2535 MHz2250 MHzAD10622900M8 GB, GDDR6, 128-bit
RX 6700 XT$3502560642424 MHz2581 MHz2000 MHzNavi 2217200M12 GB, GDDR6, 192-bit
RTX 3070$3205888961500 MHz1725 MHz1750 MHzGA10417400M8 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RTX 3070 Ti$3706144961575 MHz1770 MHz1188 MHzGA10417400M8 GB, GDDR6X, 256-bit
RX 6800$3403840961815 MHz2105 MHz2000 MHzNavi 2126800M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
RX 7700 XT$3703456962171 MHz2544 MHz2250 MHzNavi 3226500M12 GB, GDDR6, 192-bit
RX 6800 XT$40046081282015 MHz2250 MHz2000 MHzNavi 2126800M16 GB, GDDR6, 256-bit
Posted on

Endgame Gear XM2 8K Review

Introduction

Endgame Gear Logo

Endgame Gear is a peripherals company based in Germany. Essentially, the ambidextrous XM2 8K is an OP1 8K with a different shell. Much like the latter, the XM2 8K comes equipped with PixArt’s PAW3395 sensor capable of 26,000 CPI, and is capable of 8000 Hz polling. The main buttons are outfitted with Kailh GX switches, which, unlike most other mechanical switches, have a top and bottom contact (SPDT, single-pole and double-throw). When actuating the switch, the click therefore can already be registered when the top contact has been disengaged, instead of having to wait until the bottom contact is closed, reducing physical latency in the process. In addition, the GX switch can also be employed as a way of providing additional hardware debouncing, preventing unintended double-clicking. Weighing 51 g, the XM2 8K does without holes or an open-bottom design. The feet are made of pure PTFE, and the cable is the particularly flexible “Flex Cord 5.0.” Configuration is possible within lightweight software that doesn’t require installation. The XM2 8K is available in either black, white, Dark Frost, or White Frost.

Specifications

Endgame Gear XM2 8K
Size:122 mm x 66 mm x 38 mm
Size (inches):4.80″ x 2.60″ x 1.50″
Ambidextrous:Partially (side buttons on left side only)
Weight:51 g
Number of Buttons:5+1 (including wheel click)
Main Switches:Kailh GX (80 M)
Wheel Encoder:TTC (silver), 5 mm
Sensor:PixArt PAW3395
Resolution:50–26,000 CPI
Microcontroller Unit:Nuvoton M483SIDAE
Polling Rate:1000/2000/4000/8000 Hz
Cable:1.80 m, braided
Software:Yes
Price:$74.99
Warranty:Two years
Posted on

be quiet! Light Base 900 DX Review

be quiet! Light Base 900 DX Review | TechPowerUp

be quiet! Light Base 900 DX Review 7

Packaging & Contents »

Introduction

be quiet! Logo

I would like to thank be quiet! for supplying the review sample.

With its cases, be quiet! has mostly been offering traditional layouts for the most part. While their ranges differ in purpose as well as featuring varying degrees of sophistication, one thing that hasn’t been something you will see too much of is ARGB lighting. Sure, there are various FX variants of their cases, but illumination was never a fundamental focus. The Light Base series, as the name implies, changes that approach as its lit base wraps around three sides of the chassis. On top of that, thanks to some clever tooling and design details, the Light Base series can be placed on your desktop in three different ways. We are reviewing the Light Base 900 DX, which is the largest variant of the series. Unlike the FX SKUs which include four ARGB fans, the 900 DX does not ship with any such cooling units. Each of these products is available in black or white, we have the white variant for review.

Specifications

be quiet! Light Base 900 DX
Case Type:Dual-Chamber Tower
Material:Steel, plastic, and tempered glass
Weight:16.8 kg
Slots:8
Drive Bays:2x 2.5 or 1x 3.5″
2x 2.5″
Motherboard
Form Factors:
Mini-ITX, Micro-ATX, ATX, and E-ATX
Dimensions:532 x 327 x 484 mm
Front Door/Cover:N/A
Front Fans:N/A
Rear Fans:1x 120 or 140 mm (optional)
Top Fans:3x 120 or 140 mm (optional)
Bottom Fans:3x 120 or 140 mm (optional)
Side Fans:3x 120 or 140 mm (optional)
Front Radiator:N/A
Rear Radiator:120 / 140 mm
Top Radiator:120 / 140 / 240 / 280 / 360 / 420 mm
Bottom Radiator:120 / 140 / 240 / 280 / 360 / 420 mm
Side Radiator:120 / 140 / 240 / 280 / 360 mm
I/O:1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C
2x USB 3.0
1x Audio combo
Fan/LED Controller:2x Fan/ARGB PCB – total of 12 PWM and 12 ARGB ports
Compatibility:CPU Cooler: 190 mm
GPU: 495 mm
PSU: 225 mm

‘).appendTo(‘body’); $(window).scroll(nextPageScrollHandler); } if (evt.touches.length==0) $(‘#keep-scrolling-buffer’).removeClass(‘show’); else { if ($(‘#keep-scrolling’).hasClass(‘show’)) $(‘#keep-scrolling-buffer’).addClass(‘show’); } }); }); ]]>

‘); $(‘.tpu-fancybox-wrap’).css(‘maxWidth’, maxWidth);*/ instance.$refs.stage.on(‘transitionend’, function() { updateButtonPos(instance); }); }, onUpdate: updateButtonPos, afterShow: function(instance, slide) { updateButtonPos(instance); instance.$refs.inner.find(‘.fancybox-tpu-nav’).show(); }, beforeClose: function(instance, slide) { instance.$refs.inner.find(‘.fancybox-tpu-nav’).hide(); }, afterClose: function(instance, slide) { $(‘.tpu-fancybox-wrap’).contents().unwrap(); $(‘body’).removeClass(‘tpu-fancybox-body-wrap’) }, baseTpl: ‘

‘, }); }); } loadjs.ready([‘jquery’, ‘fancybox’], function() { attachLightbox(function() { return $(‘.text a:has(>img)’).filter(function(i, el) { return $(this).attr(‘href’).match(/.(jpg|gif|png)(?=$|[?#])/) != null; }); }); }); loadjs.ready([‘jquery’], function() { $(‘.review’).on(‘click’, ‘.spoiler > a’, function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).next(‘div’).toggle(); }); $(‘.review’).on(‘click’, ‘.ispoiler’, function(e) { e.preventDefault(); $(this).find(‘div’).css(‘filter’, ”); $(this).removeClass(‘ispoiler’); }); }); loadjs.ready([‘jquery’], function() { $(‘table.tputbl.sort-header’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).css(‘cursor’, ‘pointer’).on(‘click’, function(e) { var header=$(this) header.parents(‘table’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).removeClass(‘sort-active’); header.addClass(‘sort-active’); var idx=header.parents(‘tr’).find(‘th[scope=col]’).index(this); header.parents(‘table’).find(‘td, th[scope=row]’).filter(function() { return $(this).index() == idx; }).sortElementsTPU(function(a, b) { a=$(a).text(); b=$(b).text(); if (header.hasClass(‘sort-force-number’)) { a=parseInt(a, 10); b=parseInt(b, 10); } if (header.hasClass(‘sort-nan-is-zero’)) { if (isNaN(a)) a=0; if (isNaN(b)) b=0; } try { var result=a.localeCompare(b, undefined, { numeric: true, sensitivity: ‘base’ }); return result; } catch(e) { if (a>b) return 1; if (a

Posted on

Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master Review

Introduction

GIGABYTE Logo

We’ve recently seen slightly different takes from the competition and their premium X870E motherboards. Now it’s finally time to see what Gigabyte has been cooking in its motherboard R&D labs when it comes to new features tempting you to upgrade. The X870E Aorus Master’s success and that of its Socket AM5 siblings we’ll be looking at soon is especially important given how disappointing Intel’s Core Ultra 200 processors were at launch and how many will likely be snapping up a Ryzen 7 9800X3D between now and Christmas.

Of course, there are plenty of good X670 and B650 boards out there too, so there will be inevitable comparisons and justifications whether spending $500 on a motherboard is worthwhile. At this price, you’re looking for a product that’s attractive, has cutting edge features, a great EFI and slick software, but perhaps more importantly, stand-out features that help it make its case against cheaper models as well as the competition.

So far we’ve seen updated EFIs and software, a focus on tool-free features and somewhat disappointing accessory sets from similarly-priced boards, so the question is what can Gigabyte offer to stand out from the crowd, especially compared to ASRock’s Taichi boards that are noticeably cheaper. We doubt many would find the board unattractive with a familiar blocky heatsink design that’s been a feature on Gigabyte motherboards for a few generations.

The Gigabyte X870E Aorus Master is also a little more appealing than ASRock’s X870E Taichi boards in terms of size, sticking to the confines of ATX rather than stretching to E-ATX. It offers similar RGB-illuminated coverage to other boards we’ve seen too. There are plenty of options below the board in terms of price, so if the design or other features we look at over the next few pages mean Gigabyte is your preferred option for your Socket AM5 setup, then we’ll be back soon with more X870 boards from the company.

Specifications

Specifications
CPU Support:AMD Socket AM5 Ryzen 7000, 9000
Power Design:CPU Power: 16-phase
SOC Power: 2-phase
MISC Power: 2-phase
Chipset:AMD X870E
Integrated Graphics:Supported
1x HDMI
2x DisplayPort via USB-C
Memory:4x DIMM, Support up to 256 GB
2x Single Rank DDR5-8600 (OC)
BIOS:256 Mbit AMI UEFI
Expansion Slots:1x PCIe Gen 5 x16 slots (x16/x0) or (x8/x4)
1x PCIe Gen 4 x16 slot
1x PCIe Gen 3 x16 slot
Storage:4x SATA 6 Gb/s
3x M.2 (PCIe Gen 5 x4)
1x M.2 (PCIe Gen 4 x4)
Networking:1x Realtek RT8126 5 Gbps Ethernet
1x Qualcomm QCNCM865 Wi-Fi 7
Rear Ports:Q-Flash Plus Flashback button
Clear CMOS button
1x 5 Gbps Ethernet
1x HDMI port
2x USB4 40 Gbps (Type-C)
4x USB 3.2 Gen 2 10 Gbps (Type-A)
4x USB 3.0 (Type-A)
2x Wi-Fi antenna connectors
2x Audio jacks
1x Optical S/PDIF Out port
Audio:1x Realtek ALC1220 Codec
Fan / Thermistor headers:8x 4-pin / 2x 2-pin
Form Factor:ATX Form Factor
12.0 x 9.6 in. / 30.5 x 24.3 cm
Exclusive Features:
  • Dual CPU Power Connectors
  • M.2 EZ-Match
  • WI-FI EZ-Plug
  • EZ-Latch Plus
  • EZ-Latch Click
  • Sensor Panel Link
  • HWiNFO Power Monitor
  • Ultra Durable PCIe Armor
  • BIOS Flashback
  • DDR Wind Blade
Posted on

STALKER 2 Performance Benchmark Review – 35 GPUs Tested

Introduction

“Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl” marks the long-awaited return of the iconic S.T.A.L.K.E.R. series, arriving 15 years after the release of “Stalker: Call of Pripyat” in 2009. We finally get to go back to the legendary Zone, a radioactive wasteland warped by the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster. The game takes you to a world full of dangerous enemies, rival factions, mutated creatures and deadly anomalies, uncovering the dark truths behind the Zone.

With its dynamic open world, advanced survival mechanics, and branching storylines shaped by player choices, “Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl” revitalizes the beloved franchise with cutting-edge visuals and a gripping narrative. Combining survival horror with deep storytelling, this long-anticipated sequel captures the essence of the Stalker series while also introducing new layers of tension and immersion.

Stalker 2 is developed by GSC Game World—the famous Ukrainian game studio. Unreal Engine 5 is used, which has the ability to deliver stunning visuals as we’ve seen in other releases this year. While the first Stalker games used DirectX 9 and DirectX 10, this year’s release is built with full support for DirectX 12. Unreal’s “Lumen” technology is used, but only in the software, shader-based, version. Unfortunately there is no support for hardware ray tracing.

The full range of modern upscaling technologies is included, such as NVIDIA DLSS, AMD FSR and Intel XeSS. You also get frame generation support using AMD FSR or NVIDIA DLSS 3—both can be enabled and disabled separately.

This review will evaluate the performance of Stalker 2: Heart of Chornobyl across a wide range of contemporary graphics cards, compare image quality settings, and analyze the game’s VRAM usage to provide insight into the hardware requirements needed for an optimal experience.